A master argues in a post-collision proceeding that the collision was caused solely by the other vessel's failure to comply with the Rules, and therefore his vessel bears no responsibility. Under Rule 2(a), this argument:

1. A. Succeeds, because Rule 2 only imposes responsibility on the vessel that violated the Rules
2. B. Succeeds, because the stand-on vessel is always exonerated when the give-way vessel fails to act
3. ✓ Fails, because Rule 2(a) does not exonerate any vessel, owner, master, or crew from the consequences of neglect to comply with the Rules or neglect of ordinary seamanship precautionsCorrect
4. D. Succeeds, provided the master can demonstrate the vessel displayed proper lights and shapes