USCG Exam Practice · Rule 2 — Responsibility
A vessel's master strictly follows every applicable Inland Navigation Rule throughout a voyage, yet a collision still occurs due to a failure to take a precaution required by the ordinary practice of seamen. Under Rule 2, which statement is correct?
- AThe master is exonerated because all Rules were followed
- BOnly the vessel owner bears responsibility because the master followed the Rules
- CThe vessel, owner, master, and crew are not exonerated from the consequences of neglecting that precaution✓ correct
- DThe crew bears sole responsibility for failing to execute seamanlike precautions
Why C is correct
33 CFR §83.02(a) states that nothing in the Rules exonerates any vessel, owner, master, or crew from the consequences of neglect of any precaution required by the ordinary practice of seamen or by the special circumstances of the case, even if the Rules themselves were followed.
Cited:33 CFR §83.02
Drill more Rule 2 — Responsibility questions
Every CaptainsGround answer cites the rule it tests — verified, not guessed. Try a free 5-question drill, no sign-up.
More practice questions
- Under the Inland Navigation Rules, which parties may be held responsible for the conseq…
- A vessel's master strictly follows every applicable Inland Navigation Rule but fails to…
- Under the Inland Navigation Rules, 'vessels shall be deemed to be in sight of one anoth…
- A master invokes 33 CFR §83.02(b) to justify departing from a specific Inland Navigatio…
- Under the Inland Navigation Rules, which parties may be held responsible for the conseq…
- Which of the following factors is explicitly identified in Rule 2(b) as something that …