USCG Exam PracticeRule 2 — Responsibility
A vessel's master strictly follows a Navigation Rule but, in doing so, fails to take a precaution that the ordinary practice of seamen would require under the circumstances. A collision results. Which statement best describes the legal consequence under Inland Rule 2?
- A. The master is exonerated because the Rules were followed exactly as written
- B. Only the owner bears liability because the master acted in good faith
- ✓ The vessel, owner, master, or crew may still be held responsible for neglecting the precaution required by ordinary seamanshipCorrect
- D. Liability attaches only if the master also violated a specific numbered rule
Why C is correct
33 CFR §83.02(a) makes clear that compliance with the Rules does not exonerate any vessel, owner, master, or crew from the consequences of neglecting any precaution required by the ordinary practice of seamen or by the special circumstances of the case. Rule compliance alone is not a complete defense.
Cited:33 CFR §83.02